November 13, 2015 – Does Health Republic Owe You Money?
| PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
Dr. Joseph R. Maldonado
November 13, 2015
Volume 15, Number 43
The news of the financial meltdown of Health Republic has grown increasingly grim.
Questions are being raised if or how much physicians, hospitals and others will be paid for the care they have provided to HR-insured patients. As such, it is imperative that physicians complete a MSSNY survey sent to you multiple times this week to aggregate the amounts that you are due from Health Republic. Hospital associations have been quoted in numerous news reports as being owed over $150 million.
We need to get similar hard data from physicians to help MSSNY advocate on your behalf to be treated fairly. If you have not already responded, please complete this survey NOW by clicking here.
As of this writing, more than 40% of the survey respondents have outstanding claims to Health Republic, of which:
- 7% are owed $100,000 or more
- 15% are owed $25,000 or more
- 43% are owed $5,000 or more
- 74% are owed $1,000 or more
Combining the survey results we have received so far with financial data received from numerous physician practices across New York State, it is estimated that physicians across New York State are owed at least tens of millions of dollars from Health Republic.
MSSNY has been in continuous contact with DFS and New York State of Health officials to obtain necessary information for physicians to be able to help their patients with the enrollment decisions they will have to make. We have also been advocating to these officials to assure that physicians be fully paid for the care they have provided to patients insured by Health Republic.
Certainly, the financial meltdown of Health Republic is a strong reason why many have called for the New York State Legislature to enact a special fund to assure claims will be paid and prevent against similar problems in the future.
Joseph Maldonado, M.D, MSc, MBA, DipEBHC
Please send your comments to email@example.com
For Late-Breaking News: See item below
Health Republic Enrollees to Transition to Excellus, MVP or Fidelis Coverage
Health Republic enrollees who do not select a new plan by November 30 will be auto-enrolled in Excellus, MVP or Fidelis for the remainder of 2015, according to an announcement today by the NYS Department of Financial Services and NY State of Health.
In addition, Fidelis, Excellus, and MVP have agreed to credit any deductible and out-of-pocket amounts that consumers have already paid through their Health Republic coverage during 2015 – helping ensure that individuals who make the transition will not be required to restart these payments in 2015.
According to the press release, during the third week of November, individuals enrolled in Health Republic through NYSOH and who have not yet selected a new health plan for December 1, 2015, will receive an auto-enrollment notice from NYSOH telling them — based on their county of residence – whether they will be auto-enrolled in either Fidelis Care, Excellus, or MVP. Individuals who reside in the Rochester area (including Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Seneca, Wayne and Yates counties) will receive an offer to enroll from Excellus. Individuals who reside in Ulster County will receive an offer to enroll in MVP. Individuals who reside in all other counties of the state will receive an offer to enroll from Fidelis Care. In order for coverage to become effective, individuals will need to make their premium payment for the month of December 2015. Consumers will be auto enrolled into the same metal tier or option that is most similar to the coverage the individual selected through Health Republic.
As noted in the DFS press release, under New York law, Health Republic members who are: a) in an ongoing course of treatment with a physicians for a life-threatening or a degenerative and disabling condition or disease, or b) in the second or third trimester of a pregnancy when their new coverage becomes effective, may be able to continue to receive care from their physician for up to 60 days (or through pregnancy) under their new health insurance policy, even if the physician does not participate with the new health insurer (subject to agreement by that physician).
Affiliation between Albany Med and Saratoga Hospital Still Being Worked Out
The Albany (NY) Business Review (11/9, French, Subscription Publication) reported that “details of the planned affiliation between Albany Medical Center, the second-largest health system in the Albany area, and Saratoga Hospital are still being worked out” and may not be finalized for months. However, “another affiliation being pursued by Albany Med provides a roadmap for what the agreement might look like,” a deal with “Columbia Memorial in Hudson.” Under that agreement, “Albany Med’s board” would have “a say in approving new board members for Columbia.” However, “Columbia Memorial’s board of directors would still recruit and select those new directors.”
Date and time: December 4, 12:30 – 1:30 PM via WebEx
Presenter: Dr. Joshua Cohen
Program Summary: A look into the two most common disorders facing returning veterans today, from symptoms and diagnosis to treatment and recovery, and how to overcome the unique challenges posed by military culture.
For any questions, contact: Greg Elperin at firstname.lastname@example.org
Please register here.
REGISTER NOW FOR FINAL 2015 E-PRESCRIBING CME WEBINAR ON DEC. 9TH
The Medical Society of the State of New York will host its final 2015 free continuing medical education webinar on E-prescribing on December 9 at 7:30 a.m. for MSSNY members.
Registration is now open to MSSNY physicians by clicking here. Select training session and then upcoming tabs.
The webinar will be held on Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 7:30 a.m. The program, entitled, “New York State Requirement for E-prescribing of All Substances,” includes the following educational objectives:
- Describe the e-prescribing mandate, to whom it applies, when it becomes effective, and how physicians can comply with its requirements.
- Describe the practitioner electronic prescribing of controlled substances registration process, to whom it pertains, and the information required to be provided by physicians in order to register eRX software with the Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement.
- Describe the exceptions to the e-prescribing mandate and any additional requirements associated with those exceptions.
- Describe the application process and criteria for a waiver from the e-prescribing mandate.
- Describe what rules pertain to physicians who only prescribe non-controlled substances
The Medical Society of the State of New York designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA/PRA Category 1 credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Terri Holmes at email@example.com.
E-prescribing of all substances will be required in New York State by March 27, 2016. The ISTOP legislation enacted in 2012 required e-prescribing of ALL substances. Regulations pertaining to the E-prescribing requirements were adopted on March 27, 2013. The Medical Society of the State of New York was successful in obtaining a delay in the e-prescribing requirements for all substances to March 27, 2016.
Startup Cureatr Targeting Albany Market.
The New York Business Journal (11/11, French) reports healthcare startup Cureatr, which notifies “a patient’s primary care doctor in real-time if that patient goes to the emergency room,” will start by targeting the Albany area. The company is currently working at Albany Medical Center “and is now working on partnering with the other major hospital systems in the region, CEO Dr. Joe Mayer said.”
MSSNY Announces 2016 Medical Matters Schedule
The Medical Society of the State of New York will begin its 2016 Medical Matters webinars on January 20, 2016 with a program entitled Immunizations during a Disaster, with Dr. William Valenti as faculty. All programs will begin at 7:30 a.m.
Registration is now open to physicians and other public health officials here. Go to training session and upcoming sessions tab.
Educational objectives for the January 20 program are:
- Review recommendations for immunizations during disasters
- Review recommendations for immunizations for responders
- Describe best practices to avoid vaccine preventable diseases (VPD) during disasters
- Describe the importance of herd immunity
Additional program include: Public Health Preparedness 101 on February 17, 2016 and Radiological Emergencies on March 16, 2016. Further information on these programs can be found here.
The Medical Society of the State of New York is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Medical Society of the State of New York designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA/PRA Category 1 credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Further information or assistance in registering for any of these programs, may be obtained by contacting Melissa Hoffman at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AMA Urges Department of Justice to Reject Further Health Insurer Consolidation; MSSNY Makes Similar Request to NY-DFS
The AMA has written to the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, to urge that DOJ block the proposed mergers of health insurance giants Anthem (the parent of Empire BC/BS) and Cigna, as well as Aetna and Humana. MSSNY had previously written to the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) to urge that either the proposed Anthem-Cigna merger be rejected in New York State, or require that the merged entity agree to reform numerous market conduct issues that were identified in the recent DFS 2015 Guide to Health Insurers. Concerns with the proposed mergers has also been the subject of numerous op-eds written by County Medical Society Presidents across New York State, including in the Binghamton, Buffalo and Jamestown papers.
According to a recent AMA report, the proposed health insurer consolidation would significantly enhance the market power and/or raise competitive concerns of these combined entities in multiple states across the country, including, within New York State, Long Island, New York City and the Hudson Valley.
Among the key points in the AMA letter to the DOJ were:
- The proposed mergers are occurring in markets where there has already been a near total collapse of competition.
- A growing body of peer-reviewed literature suggests that greater health insurer consolidation leads to price increases, as opposed to greater efficiency or lower health care costs. The mergers would reduce pressures on plans to offer broader networks to compete for members and would create fewer networks that are simultaneously under no competitive pressure to respond to patients’ access needs.
- Health insurer monopsony, or buyer power, acquired through the proposed mergers would, as the Department of Justice has found in earlier cases, likely degrade the quality and reduce the quantity of physician services. In the long run health insurer exercise of monopsony power may motivate physicians to retire early or seek opportunities outside of medicine that are more rewarding. This would exacerbate an already significant shortage of primary care physicians in the United States;
- There is no evidence supporting the insurer’s claim that the proposed mergers would lead to greater efficiencies and innovative payment and care management programs; and
- Fostering competition, not consolidation, benefits American consumers through lower prices, better quality, and greater choice.
Office of National Coordinator Seeks Physician Input on Aspects of Meaningful Use
In an effort to improve the interoperability of EHRs the AMA is assisting the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) with gathering information to improve the summary of care document that is produced to meet the Transfer of Care objective in Stage 2 of Meaningful Use. The AMA has asked physicians to take a 5-10 minute survey that will help ONC create a new standard that will reduce the number of pages in the summary of care document, thus making it easier to find relevant information. The survey link is here. The survey will close on November 30.
Doctors Without Borders Recruiting Doctors; Info Session on Nov. 19 in Manhattan
Doctors Without Borders is recruiting qualified MEDICAL AND NON-MEDICAL professionals in New York to respond to ongoing humanitarian crises and join their team of dedicated humanitarian aid workers. They are hosting a recruitment information session at their New York headquarters New York Recruitment Info Session Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM at Doctors Without Borders, 333 Seventh Ave, Second Floor, NY, NY. Click here to learn more. Click here to register for the New York session
Question: When is the new deadline to appeal two penalties?
Answer: CMS has extended the deadlines for physicians and group practices facing two different Medicare penalties in 2016 to request an informal review if they believe the government made a mistake. The penalties, which whittle down reimbursement, are levied under Medicare’s Physician Quality Reporting System (“PQRS”) and the Value Based Payment Modifier (“VBM”) program. The original deadline for an informal review of both penalties had been November 9, 2015 but has now been extended until November 23, 2015.
In PQRS, Medicare penalizes physicians for unsatisfactory reporting of clinical quality data. The penalty in 2016, based on performance in 2014, will lower fee-for-service payments by 2%. Physicians, medical groups, and accountable care organizations can learn if they are due for a pay cut by obtaining a PQRS feedback report for 2014.
The CMS website explains how to obtain the report. Requests for an informal review can only be made online through the Quality Reporting Communication Support Page of CMS. CMS promises a decision, which is final, within 90 days.
To read more about this deadline extension and how to file for informal reviews, please visit:https://www.qualitynet.org/portal/server.pt/community/pqri_home/212.
If you have any questions, please contact Kern Augustine Conroy & Schoppmann, P.C. at 1-800-445-0954 or via email at info@DrLaw.com.
AMA Summary of the 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
On October 30, 2015, CMS released the (1,358 page) 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule with comment period. CMS has issued a general fact sheet and a PQRS payment adjustment fact sheet. Table 62 shows the impact of the rule on individual specialties. The AMA submitted detailed comments on the Proposed Rule on September 8, 2015. The Final Rule is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on November 16, 2015. CMS will accept comments by 5 PM on December 29, 2015, regarding interim final relative value units (work, practice expense, and malpractice); interim final HCPCS codes (in the Preamble and Addendum C); and changes to the physician self-referral HCPCS/CPT codes (tables 50-51).
Physician Payment Update & Misvalued Codes Target
The Medicare Access and Chip Reauthorization Act (MACRA) called for annual updates of 0.5 percent from July 2015 through 2019. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA) set an annual target for reductions in PFS spending, from adjustments to relative values of misvalued codes. Then the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2014 accelerated those targets, increasing the target to 1 percent for 2016 and keeping it at 0.5 percent for 2017 and 2018.
The AMA opposed these targets as completely unnecessary. The RUC and CMS have been engaged in intensive efforts to identify and address misvalued services for many years, long before Congress got involved. CMS has recognized the RUC’s vital role in helping value Medicare services. Since the RUC Relativity Assessment Workgroup began in 2006, the RUC and CMS have identified over 1,900 services through 16 different screening criteria for further review, and the RUC has recommended reductions and deletions for 1,045 services, leading to redistribution of nearly $4 billion.
In the final rule, CMS brought its methodology more in line with AMA and RUC recommendations, and rolled back planned payment reductions for both radiation treatment services (completely) and lower GI endoscopy (partially). Together with redistributions recommended by the RUC, this yields a net savings of 0.23 percent, requiring a 0.77 percent reduction to meet 1 percent target. Taking into account the 0.5 percent positive update (and a -0.02 percent budget neutrality adjustment), the 2016 Medicare conversion factor is reduced by 0.29 percent to $35.83, just 10 cents below the 2015 conversion factor of $35.93.
Advanced Care Planning
CMS finalized separate Medicare payment for two CPT codes for advance care planning services, which include conversations between patients and their physicians before an illness progresses and during treatment. The rule specifically referenced the AMA recommendations. This represents not only a win for CPT, the RUC, and the AMA, but also a turning point towards a new approach to pay for advance care planning. The Medicare statute currently provides coverage for advance care planning under the “Welcome to Medicare” visit available to all Medicare patients, but they may not need these services when they first enroll. Separate payment for advance care planning codes recognizes the additional time needed to conduct these conversations, and provides a greater opportunity and more flexibility to have these planning sessions at the most appropriate time for patients and their families. CMS is also finalizing payment for advance care planning when it is included in the “Annual Wellness Visit.”
“Incident to” Services
In the 2014 PFS final rule, CMS set explicit requirements that “incident to” services must be furnished consistent with applicable state law, including state licensure and other requirements for the “auxiliary personnel” providing the services. In the 2016 PFS final rule, CMS is also requiring that “the physician or other practitioner who bills for incident to service must also be the physician or other practitioner who directly supervises the auxiliary personnel who provide the incident to services.” (Incident to services may also be billed by clinical psychologists, PAs, NPs, CNSs, and certified nurse-midwifes. General supervision is sufficient for chronic care and transitional care management services, except patient visits.) The AMA and other physicians expressed concerns that this requirement – and CMS’ proposal to remove current regulatory language widely interpreted as allowing the supervising physician (or practitioner) to be someone different from the person who initiated the patient’s treatment and is overseeing their general care – would adversely impact the physician community, particularly group practices and multispecialty clinics. Fortunately, CMS agreed to continue its policy that the supervising physician (or practitioner) for a particular incident to service does not have to be the same person who is “treating the patient more broadly” and is adding clarifying regulatory language to that effect. The rule also finalizes regulatory changes that prohibit auxiliary personnel from providing incident to services if they have been excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal health programs or have had their enrollment revoked.
Other Payment Issues
- Primary Care Bonuses End: While not highlighted in the final rule, it is important to keep in mind that the 10 percent incentives – that section 5501(a) of the Affordable Care Act established for Part B services by primary care practitioners – are scheduled to end on December 31, 2015.
- Phase-In of Significant RVU Reductions: The PAMA specified that a decrease in value for a service of 20 percent or more, without a change in the underlying code for the service, must be phased-in over a two-year period. CMS is adopting its proposal to reducing the value for a service by 19 percent in the first year, and by the remainder in the second year.
- Misvalued Code Changes/Lower GI Endoscopy Services: CMS is adopting codes for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy as revised by the CPT Editorial Panel and related values “more closely tied” to the RUC’s recommendations.
- Misvalued Code Changes/Radiation Therapy: CMS did not finalize the new code set for radiation therapy treatment. Changes will be implemented, over 2 years, to the utilization rate for capital equipment used in radiation therapy, to 35 hours per week (70 percent utilization) instead of 25 (50 percent utilization). CMS also seeks comment on the price and usage of linear accelerators.
- Part B Drugs/Biosimilars: Payment for a biosimilar biological product will be based on the average sale price of all biosimilar biological products within the same billing/payment code.
- Technical Errors: There are two errors in the Final Rule that will be corrected in a technical correction notice:
o The 0.5 percent update was not applied to the Anesthesia conversion factor. With the appropriate application, we estimate that the correct 2016 Anesthesia conversion factor should be $22.4426.
o The work GPCI (geographical practice cost index) floor, extended under MACRA until January 1, 2018, was not applied. The GPCI tables incorrectly list work GPCIs below 1.0 for 51 localities.
Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging
PAMA requires that providers who order advanced diagnostic imaging services consult with AUC via a clinical decision support mechanism. PAMA also requires CMS to specify AUC from among those developed or endorsed by national medical professional specialty societies and other provider-led entities; to approve clinical decision support mechanisms; to collect additional information on the Medicare claim form; and to develop a prior authorization program based upon the claims information. CMS is establishing which organizations are eligible to develop or endorse AUC, the evidence-based requirements for AUC development, and the process CMS will follow for qualifying provider-led entities. Consistent with concerns expressed by the AMA, CMS says it will not have AUC in place and ready for consultation by ordering physicians by the January 1, 2017 deadline, so the requirement for consultation will be delayed. Also consistent with AMA advocacy, CMS is reconsidering application of the AUC to emergency departments, and will review this issue in next year’s PFS rule.
Prior to MACRA, physicians and practitioners that wished to renew their opt-out were required to file new valid affidavits with their Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) every 2 years. CMS clarifies in the final rule that under MACRA, physicians and practitioners that filed valid opt-out affidavits on or after June, 16, 2015 are not required to file renewal affidavits. Such physicians and practitioners may cancel the renewal by notifying all MACs with which they filed an affidavit in writing, at least 30 days prior to the start of the new two-year opt-out period.
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)
Despite objections from the AMA and other physician specialty societies, CMS is maintaining the same strict minimum measure reporting requirements—of nine measures covering three National Quality Strategy domains—for the 2016 reporting period which determines the 2018 PQRS payment adjustment. Individual eligible professionals (EPs) or group practices that fail to satisfactorily report or otherwise participate in PQRS for 2016 will receive a 2 percent negative payment adjustment on covered professional services in 2018. CMS is finalizing additions to the PQRS measure set to fill gaps, and deleting measures considered “topped out,” duplicative, or replaced. The 2016 PQRS measure set will have 281 measures and the GPRO Web Interface will have 18. CMS will allow group practices to report quality measure data using a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR), as required under MACRA.
All 2016 individual EP and group practice PQRS measures will be available for public reporting on Physician Compare. This includes ACO measures and “CAHPS for PQRS survey” measures for groups of two or more EPs that have the required sample size and collect data via a CMS-specified certified CAHPS vendor. CMS is withdrawing its plan to indicate (on profile pages) which EPs and which group practices receive a VM bonus, but is finalizing the inclusion on Physician Compare of:
- Certifying board, including the American Osteopathic Association Board;
- An indicator for individual EPs who satisfactorily report PQRS Cardiovascular Prevention measures in support of the Million Hearts initiative (on profile pages);
- Individual and group-level QCDR measures;
- In the downloadable database: Value Modifier tiers for cost and quality; whether the EP or group practice is high, low, or neutral on cost and quality; the resulting payment adjustment; which eligible EPs or group practices did not report quality measures to CMS; utilization data for individual EPs; and
- An item (or measure)-level benchmark based on the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) methodology, displayed as a five-star rating.
Value-Based Payment Modifier (VM)
CMS will no longer apply an automatic VM penalty to TINs receiving a PQRS penalty, if on informal review at least 50 percent of EPs avoid the PQRS penalty. If CMS does not have sufficient data to calculate their VM quality score, they will be considered “average quality.” CMS is finalizing the following key provisions for the 2016 reporting period/2018 payment adjustments:
- The VM will apply to nonphysician EPs who are Physician Assistants (PAs), Nurse Practitioners (NPs), Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs), and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) practicing either in groups or as solo practitioners.
- The quality-tiering methodology will apply to all groups and solo practitioners. However, PAs, NPs, CNSs, and CRNAs will not receive downward adjustments under quality-tiering in 2018.
- The maximum upward adjustment under quality-tiering will continue at: o +4.0 times the adjustment factor for solo physicians and groups with 10 or more EPs.
o +2.0 times the adjustment factor, for solo physicians and groups with 2 to 9 EPs.
o +2.0 times the adjustment factor for solo and groups of PAs, NPs, CNSs, and CRNAs.
- The amount of payment at risk is: o -4.0 percent for groups of physicians with 10 or more EPs.
o -2.0 percent for solo physicians and groups with 2 to 9 EPs.
o -2.0 percent for solo and groups of PAs, NPs, CNSs, and CRNAs.
Beginning with VM adjustments in 2017:
- The VM is waived for EPs and groups if at least one EP who billed for PFS items and services under their TIN participated in the Pioneer ACO Model, Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative, or other similar Innovation Center model (such as Comprehensive ESRD Care Initiative, Oncology Care Model, and the Next Generation ACO Model).
- The Medicare Spending per Beneficiary measure will only apply to EPs with at least 125 episodes.
- For solo practitioners and groups with 2 to 9 EPs, the All-Cause Hospital Readmissions measure will not be used in the quality calculation.
Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP)
- The final rule adds a “Statin Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease” measure in the Preventive Health domain to align with PQRS reporting.
- Measures can stay or revert to “pay for reporting” if a measure owner determines they no longer align with updated clinical practice or cause patient harm.
- The rule clarifies how EPs in an ACO can meet their PQRS requirements.
- “Primary care services” include claims submitted by Electing Teaching Amendment hospitals and exclude certain services furnished in Skilled Nursing Facilities.
Physician Self-Referral Law
The physician self-referral law prohibits: (1) a physician from making referrals for certain “designated health services” (DHS) payable by Medicare to an entity with which he or she (or an immediate family member) has a financial relationship, unless the requirements of an applicable exception are satisfied; and (2) the entity from filing claims with Medicare (or billing another individual, entity, or third party payer) for those DHS furnished as a result of a prohibited referral. The final rule establishes two new exceptions and clarifies certain terms and requirements.
New Exceptions: Permit payment to physicians by hospitals, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs), to compensate non-physician practitioners under certain conditions; and permit timeshare arrangements for the use of office space, equipment, personnel, items, supplies, and other services. CMS believes these will enhance access to care, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
Physician-Owned Hospitals: The ACA established new restrictions on physician-owned hospitals, including setting a baseline physician ownership percentage they cannot exceed, and requiring statements of physician ownership on websites and in advertising. CMS is clarifying that a broad range of actions comply with these requirements, and finalized changes to the physician ownership calculation, effective January 2017, to include all physicians, not just those who refer to the hospital.
Clarifying Terminology and Policy Guidance: Relating to settlement of overpayments resulting from physician self-referral law violations is designed to “reduce perceived or actual noncompliance.”
- Compensation paid to a physician organization cannot take into account the referrals of any physician in the physician organization (as opposed to the referrals of a physician who stands in the shoes of the physician organization).
- Employees and independent contractors do not have to sign arrangements with the physician organization and a DHS entity.
- Exceptions to the referral and billing prohibitions can be based on a collection of documents.
- The terminology that describes these types of arrangements was made more consistent.
- The term of leases and personal service arrangements lasting at least 1 year, and otherwise compliant, does not have to be in writing.
- Expired lease and personal services arrangements can continue indefinitely if otherwise compliant.
- A 90-day grace period is allowed to obtain missing signatures, inadvertent or not.
- DHS entities can give physicians items used solely for a purpose identified in the statute.
- A financial relationship does not exist when a physician provides services to hospital patients in the hospital, if both the hospital and the physician bill independently for their services.
- The exception for ownership in publicly traded entities allows over-the-counter transactions.
- The definition of a locum tenens physician was simplified.
- Geographic service areas were clarified for FQHC and RHC physician recruitment exceptions.
- Under the retention exception, retention payments based on physician certification may be no more than 25 percent of the physician’s current annual salary averaged over 24 months
Office Space–Sutton Place
Newly renovated medical office. Windows in every room look out to a park like setting on the plaza level. 2-4 exam rooms/offices available, possible procedure room or gym. Separate reception and waiting area, use of 3 bathrooms and a shower. Central air and wireless. All specialties welcome. Public transportation nearby. Please call 212-772-6011 or e-mail: email@example.com
Office Near UN for Rent
Modern 3000 sq. ft. medical office to rent near the United Nations. Handicapped accessible; private reception area; secretarial area available; 6 exam rooms. Ideal for ophthalmologist/optometrist. Could suit other specialties. Available for full or part time. $1300 per month for one day per week. Please contact Dr. Weissman at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 914-772-5581.
Exceptionally Distinctive Large Medical Offices for Sale. 115 East 61 Street, NYC
Great location between Park and Lexington Avenues— conveniently located between midtown and Upper East Side. Easy access to hospitals and transportation. Full–time attended lobby. No steps. Beautiful well–lit space adaptable to all specialties. Prestigious all–medical/dental building. Liberal sublet policy. Contact Sharon F. Aspis at (212) 692–6139.
Office Rental 30 Central Park South
Two fully equipped exam, two certified operating, bathrooms and consultation room. Shared secretarial and waiting rooms. Elegantly decorated, central a/c, hardwood floors. Next to Park Lane and Plaza hotels. $1250 for four days a month. Available full or part-time. 212.371.0468 / email@example.com.
Midtown Office- Rockefeller Center
Sunny, upscale office. Furnished or unfurnished. Tranquil Ambience, waterfall, well maintained building. MUST BE SEEN. If interested in renting please call 646-242-4742